Thursday, August 13, 2020

Underwater Forensics

Must read

LAPD Warrant Lets Cops Open Apple iPhone With Owner’s Fingerprints

As CEO Tim Cook and the FBI engaged in a very public spat over an encrypted iPhone, cops down the road quietly acquired a warrant to apply...

Fingerprint identifications from images and video recovered from cell phones

This week we saw an excellent case of a fingerprint identification from Sarasota, Florida, where fingerprint detail was obtained from a photograph recovered from a Samsung mobile...

First evaluation of new fingerprinting methods for ivory

Scientists from King's College London and University College London have collaborated with imaging and fingerprint experts from the Metropolitan Police to validate the use...

Fighting food fraud with forensics

Each apple has a chemical fingerprint that links it to the place it was grown. A technique used by forensic scientists to identify bodies at...
Michael Whyte
Crime Scene Officer and Fingerprint Expert with over 7 years experience in Crime Scene Investigation and Latent Print Analysis. The opinions or assertions contained on this site are the private views of the author and are not to be construed as those of any professional organisation or policing body.
- Forensic Podcast -

Poisoning the Well

Susan Smith

On October 17, 1994, Tom Findlay wrote a letter to Susan Smith telling tell her that he was not interested in continuing their relationship because he did not want to be responsible for another man’s children. He pointed out other problems as well, but Smith fixated on that single item: If only she had no children he would remain with her.

Still in a daze a week later on October 25, she picked up her two sons and drove around in her Mazda Protg for over an hour. She ended up at John D. Long Lake outside Union, S.C., and parked on the gravel boat ramp. Michael, 3, and fourteen-month-old Alex were asleep in the back, strapped securely into the seat. Smith put the car into neutral and felt it start to roll toward the water. According to her, she could no longer bear her life and she wanted her sons to go to heaven, but others believe that she simply couldn’t bear the thought of being abandoned by the man she loved—a married man. She’d already lost her father and her husband. She later claimed she had no choice but to end it.

But then she put on the brake and got out of the car. She decided she had to kill her sons first, to be sure they were dead. She hesitated and then reached into the car to release the emergency brake. The Mazda, lights still on, rolled forward. Smith watched as the car floated for a few moments and then filled with water. She knew her boys, probably struggling, were drowning. Finally the car submerged but Smith did not follow it into the water. Instead she ran to a nearby house, screaming that a black man had accosted her at a traffic light and taken her car with her sons inside.

She played the hysterical mother, fooling the woman in the house, responding police, and soon attempting to deceive the entire nation as she televised a plea to get her sons back. Her shocked, estranged husband, David, stood by her side.

Yet her story failed to add up to investigators, and her voluntary lie detector test results were mixed. It appeared that she knew where her sons were and knew that they were dead. Finally, nine days after the incident, she confessed to what she had done.

After ascertaining that the boys had been pushed into the lake, divers went in but were unable to find the car. It turned out they had miscalculated where the car might be because no one imagined that Smith had simply allowed it to roll in slowly. They went in again and found the upside down car, with the boys still strapped in and hanging from the seat. One diver described seeing a small hand against the window glass. Smith was convicted and sentenced to life in prison. A journalist later contended that she could not have released the brake, so the homicides could have been accidental.

As difficult as it can be to scour a lake, a river presents even greater challenges.

- Advertisement -

More articles

- Advertisement -

Latest article

Using the NCIC Bayesian Network to improve your AFIS searches

This National Crime Information Centre (NCIC) Bayesian network is based on the statistical data of general patterns of fingerprints on the hands...

DNA decontamination of fingerprint brushes

Using fingerprint brushes across multiple crime scenes yields a high risk of DNA cross-contamination. Thankfully an Australian study has discovered a quick and easy way to safely decontaminate fingerprint brushes to prevent this contamination risk and allows the brushes to be safely reused even after multiple cleaning cycles.

Detection of latent fingerprint hidden beneath adhesive tape by optical coherence tomography

Adhesive tape is a common item which can be encountered in criminal cases involving rape, murder, kidnapping and explosives. It is often the case...

Presenting Fingerprint Comparisons in Court using Forensic Comparison Software

This video gives the fingerprint technician some ideas on how to present a Fingerprint Comparison result to the court that looks professional. To accomplish this...

New modified fingerprint chemical that fluoresces touch DNA on clothing

In sexual assault and burglary investigations, the recovery of DNA from items that have been handled by the suspect is very important....