Tuesday, May 26, 2020

TrueAllele Casework ruled admissible in Ohio Daubert challenge

Must read

Revolutionary fingerprint powder can reveal criminal’s sex and drug habits

A revolutionary powder claims to be able to discover what a person has eaten, what medication they’re on and even their sex, all from...

Simple, low-cost method for DNA profiling of human hairs could help trace criminals

A simple, lower-cost new method for DNA profiling of human hairs developed by the University of Adelaide should improve opportunities to link criminals to...

Forget fingerprints – banks are starting to use vein patterns for ATMs

Cash machine cards may become a thing of the past following the launch of new hi-tech ATMs which let users withdraw money simply by...

How forensic scientists fight crime by analyzing handwriting

Analysing handwriting to help solve crimes isn`t just something you see in the movies — it`s real! Patella Lewis from Q13 Fox TV, got a first-hand...
Michael Whyte
Crime Scene Officer and Fingerprint Expert with over 7 years experience in Crime Scene Investigation and Latent Print Analysis. The opinions or assertions contained on this site are the private views of the author and are not to be construed as those of any professional organisation or policing body.
- Forensic Podcast -

An Ohio judge ruled that TrueAllele® Casework is reliable under the Daubert admissibility standard. Judge Maureen Clancy also denied discovery of TrueAllele source code. The defendant Maurice Shaw accepted a guilty plea shortly after the Cleveland ruling.

“DNA evidence is invaluable to the criminal justice system, and so every advancement in analyzing it advances the cause of justice”

Cybergenetics TrueAllele is a computer system that uses sophisticated mathematics to accurately determine DNA match statistics. Forensic DNA data can pose interpretation challenges, particularly with mixtures of two or more people. Crime labs may under-report highly informative mixtures as “inconclusive,” discarding valuable evidence. TrueAllele preserves this identification information to aid criminal investigations, convictions and exonerations.

“DNA evidence is invaluable to the criminal justice system, and so every advancement in analyzing it advances the cause of justice,” said Cuyahoga County Prosecutor Timothy J. McGinty. “Judge Clancy’s ruling to accept Dr. Perlin as an expert witness and to find TrueAllele’s DNA mixture analysis admissible is an important step forward that will improve the scientific fact-finding abilities of all parties in the criminal justice system.”

The winning Cuyahoga County Prosecutors Office team included Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys Katherine Mullin, Margaret Troia and Scott Zarzycki, with assistance from Kristen Hatcher. Prosecution expert witnesses were Dr. Mark Perlin of Cybergenetics, and forensic scientist Jay Caponera from the New York State Police. Professors Ranajit Chakraborty and Dan Krane testified for the defense.

“TrueAllele makes a real difference every day in protecting the public from rapists and murderers,” said Cybergenetics President Dr. Ria David. “By complementing crime lab capabilities with scientifically reliable computing, TrueAllele serves criminal justice.”

TrueAllele has been used in over a hundred criminal cases with complex DNA evidence. The system has withstood admissibility challenges in California, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Virginia, as well as overseas. Seven peer-reviewed scientific studies have demonstrated TrueAllele’s reliability.

Cybergenetics develops patented TrueAllele technology that objectively interprets DNA evidence, providing computer systems and databasesto crime labs, and expert witness services for criminal cases. The Pittsburgh-based company reanalyzed the World Trade Center disaster DNA data.

Source: BusinessWire

- Advertisement -

More articles

- Advertisement -

Latest article

Using the NCIC Bayesian Network to improve your AFIS searches

This National Crime Information Centre (NCIC) Bayesian network is based on the statistical data of general patterns of fingerprints on the hands...

DNA decontamination of fingerprint brushes

Using fingerprint brushes across multiple crime scenes yields a high risk of DNA cross-contamination. Thankfully an Australian study has discovered a quick and easy way to safely decontaminate fingerprint brushes to prevent this contamination risk and allows the brushes to be safely reused even after multiple cleaning cycles.

Detection of latent fingerprint hidden beneath adhesive tape by optical coherence tomography

Adhesive tape is a common item which can be encountered in criminal cases involving rape, murder, kidnapping and explosives. It is often the case...

Presenting Fingerprint Comparisons in Court using Forensic Comparison Software

This video gives the fingerprint technician some ideas on how to present a Fingerprint Comparison result to the court that looks professional. To accomplish this...

New modified fingerprint chemical that fluoresces touch DNA on clothing

In sexual assault and burglary investigations, the recovery of DNA from items that have been handled by the suspect is very important....