Sunday, November 1, 2020

Richard III DNA study raises doubts about royal claims of centuries of British monarchs, researchers say

Must read

Crystal pattern mapping can recover obliterated serial numbers in metals

Researchers at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have demonstrated a technique for mapping deformation in metals that can recover destroyed serial...

How wine smelling techniques could help solve crime

Alison Davidson is a kind of olfactory Sherlock. A quiet but crisp scientist who runs the forensics lab at the University of Staffordshire, she...

Linking a person’s appearance with criminality highlights the technical and ethical limits of face recognition

WHAT can your face say about you? Face recognition systems can pick up on things like age, gender and maybe even your mood. Now, two...

Forensic expert reveals how King Richard III actually died

The blow that killed King Richard III in battle was so powerful that it went up through the base of his brain and left...
Michael Whyte
Crime Scene Officer and Fingerprint Expert with over 7 years experience in Crime Scene Investigation and Latent Print Analysis. The opinions or assertions contained on this site are the private views of the author and are not to be construed as those of any professional organisation or policing body.
- Forensic Podcast -

A DNA study that confirmed a skeleton found in 2012 was that of Richard III also found evidence of “false paternity” that raises doubts about the royal claims of centuries of British monarchs, researchers say.

The study said the remains matched the DNA of two descendants of Richard III’s sister, Anne of York, meaning researchers are certain “beyond reasonable doubt” that the skeleton is indeed the king’s. But there was no match through the male line of the family, descended from John of Gaunt, the brother of Richard III’s great-grandfather.

That means that at some point there must have been a child whose presumed father according to the official genealogy was not his real father. The skeleton of the king, who was killed at the Battle of Bosworth Field in 1485, was found under a car park in Leicester in central England.

It is due to be reinterred in the city in March next year.

“A false paternity event (or events) at some point(s) in this genealogy could be of key historical significance,” said a paper in the journal Nature Communications by a team led by the University of Leicester geneticist Turi King.

At a press conference in London, Kevin Schurer, a deputy chancellor at the university, said: “What we discovered is that there is a break in the chain … We don’t know where that break occurred.”

“We are not in any way indicating that Her Majesty [reigning Queen Elizabeth II] should not be on the throne,” he said, adding that the history of the British monarchy took “all kinds of twists and turns”.

Richard III’s skeleton was found under a car park in Leicester in central England. (Supplied: University of Leicester)

The study said the result could question the legitimacy of Henry IV, Henry V, Henry VI and “the entire Tudor dynasty” starting with Henry VII followed by Henry VIII, Edward VI, Mary I and Elizabeth I.

If the false paternity occurred further down in the genealogy, this would concern only the non-royal family of the current dukes of Beaufort.

The DNA of five living individuals from the aristocratic family was used for the research.

The results also showed Richard III had a “96 per cent probability of having blue eyes together with a 77 per cent probability of having blond hair” – meaning that only one of several surviving portraits of the ill-fated king actually resembles him.

“We conclude that the evidence is overwhelming that Skeleton 1 from the Grey Friars site in Leicester is that of Richard III, thereby closing a 500-year missing person case,” the study said.

Source: ABC News

- Advertisement -

More articles

- Advertisement -

Latest article

Trees and shrubs might reveal the location of decomposing bodies

Plants could help investigators find dead bodies. Botanists believe the sudden flush of nutrients into the soil from decomposition may affect nearby foliage. If...

Are Detectives discounting the associative value of fingerprints that fall short of an identification in their investigations?

Every day, Fingerprint Experts in every latent office across the globe examine fingermarks that they determine to fall short of an identification....

Using the NCIC Bayesian Network to improve your AFIS searches

This National Crime Information Centre (NCIC) Bayesian network is based on the statistical data of general patterns of fingerprints on the hands...

DNA decontamination of fingerprint brushes

Using fingerprint brushes across multiple crime scenes yields a high risk of DNA cross-contamination. Thankfully an Australian study has discovered a quick and easy way to safely decontaminate fingerprint brushes to prevent this contamination risk and allows the brushes to be safely reused even after multiple cleaning cycles.

Detection of latent fingerprint hidden beneath adhesive tape by optical coherence tomography

Adhesive tape is a common item which can be encountered in criminal cases involving rape, murder, kidnapping and explosives. It is often the case...