Thursday, November 26, 2020

New York Medical Examiners Not Required To Return All Organs, Court Rules

Must read

Investigator Claims To Have Solved The Ripper Mystery Using DNA

An amateur investigator has claimed to have identified Jack the Ripper, the archetypal serial killer. The claims are still far from verified, but that...

Former police officer admits: JonBenet Ramsey case was mishandled

The murder of six-year old JonBenet Ramsey is a case the world will never forget. It is in the spotlight again after a former police...

Social media in digital forensics

Social media has fundamentally changed the way information is shared and accessed. As a result, these channels are playing an increasingly important role in...

Court: Fingerprints alone don’t prove possession of a firearm

Fingerprints found on a weapon should not have automatically led to the conviction of a felon for illegally being in possession of a firearm,...
Michael Whyte
Crime Scene Officer and Fingerprint Expert with over 12 years experience in Crime Scene Investigation and Latent Print Analysis. The opinions or assertions contained on this site are the private views of the author and are not to be construed as those of any professional organisation or policing body.
- Forensic Podcast -

A New York state court has ruled that medical examiners can keep organs from autopsied bodies without notifying family members.

The case involves 17-year-old Jesse Shipley who was killed in a car accident in 2005 on Staten Island. Two months after his funeral, during a school trip to the medical examiner’s office, Jesse’s classmates saw a brain in a jar with his name on it. Though his parents agreed to an autopsy in which the brain was removed, they were unaware the body released by the medical examiner, and eventually buried, did not possess this organ.

After his brain was returned to them, the Shipleys held a second funeral and sued the city for emotional distress, arguing they should have been notified that their son’s brain had been removed. The Shipleys were initially awarded $1 million in damages, but the amount was reduced to $600,000. The city challenged the decision at the Court of Appeals, the highest court in the state, and won last Wednesday.

The ruling overturned the $600,000 jury verdict awarded to the Shipleys and dismissed the family’s claim. The case debated whether the medical examiner violated the family’s ‘right of sepulcher,’ where families have the right to claim a loved one’s body for burial.

“It is the act of depriving the next of kin of the body, and not the deprivation of organ or tissue samples within the body, that constitutes a violation of the right of sepulcher,” Judge Eugene Pigott wrote for the court, Reuters reports.

The family’s attorney said the Shipleys are “distraught” over the ruling and hope the case will encourage lawmakers to look into the issue.

Two dissenters, Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman and Judge Jenny Rivera, argued against the ruling, saying families do deserve notice. They wrote, The Guardian reports: “Perhaps the majority’s ruling will result in greater awareness of the right of sepulcher. Even so, for those who indeed know enough to seek the return of the deceased’s organs, the majority provides no ‘solace and comfort’ and little assurance that their request will be honored by the medical examiner.”

Source: IFLScience

- Advertisement -

More articles

- Advertisement -

Latest article

Trees and shrubs might reveal the location of decomposing bodies

Plants could help investigators find dead bodies. Botanists believe the sudden flush of nutrients into the soil from decomposition may affect nearby foliage. If...

Are Detectives discounting the associative value of fingerprints that fall short of an identification in their investigations?

Every day, Fingerprint Experts in every latent office across the globe examine fingermarks that they determine to fall short of an identification....

Using the NCIC Bayesian Network to improve your AFIS searches

This National Crime Information Centre (NCIC) Bayesian network is based on the statistical data of general patterns of fingerprints on the hands...

DNA decontamination of fingerprint brushes

Using fingerprint brushes across multiple crime scenes yields a high risk of DNA cross-contamination. Thankfully an Australian study has discovered a quick and easy way to safely decontaminate fingerprint brushes to prevent this contamination risk and allows the brushes to be safely reused even after multiple cleaning cycles.

Detection of latent fingerprint hidden beneath adhesive tape by optical coherence tomography

Adhesive tape is a common item which can be encountered in criminal cases involving rape, murder, kidnapping and explosives. It is often the case...