Thursday, November 26, 2020

FBI announces review of 2,000 cases featuring hair samples

Must read

Underwater Forensics

Hidden in Water On Christmas Eve 2002, Laci Peterson, eight months pregnant, disappeared from her home in Modesto, Calif. Her purse, keys, and phone were...

Court to weigh dubious evidence

FORENSIC experts hope the High Court will set new limits on the use of questionable scientific evidence in courtrooms in two ­upcoming cases. In the...

Assessing the reliability of a clothing-based forensic identification

According to the testimony of FBI forensic analysts, the patterns seen on denim are reliably unique and can be used to identify a suspect in surveillance footage. A paper published this week puts denim-pattern analysis through its paces, finding that it isn’t particularly good at matching up identical pairs of jeans—and may create a number of “false alarm” errors to boot.

Nanoparticles give up forensic secrets

A group of researchers from Switzerland has thrown light on the precise mechanisms responsible for the impressive ability of nanoparticles to detect fingermarks left...
Michael Whyte
Crime Scene Officer and Fingerprint Expert with over 7 years experience in Crime Scene Investigation and Latent Print Analysis. The opinions or assertions contained on this site are the private views of the author and are not to be construed as those of any professional organisation or policing body.
- Forensic Podcast -

The FBI will review thousands of old cases, including some involving the death penalty, in which hair samples helped secure convictions, under an ambitious plan made public Thursday.

More than 2,000 cases the FBI processed from 1985 to 2000 will be re-examined, including some in which execution dates have been set and others in which the defendants already have died in prison. In a key concession, Justice Department officials will waive usual deadlines and procedural hurdles that often block inmates from challenging their convictions.

“This will be critical to giving wrongly convicted people a fair chance at a fair review,” said Steven D. Benjamin, a Virginia attorney who’s the president of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.

The defense lawyers’ association joined with The Innocence Project, based at New York City’s Cardozo School of Law at Yeshiva University, as well as pro bono attorneys to press for the review.

The study will focus on whether analysts exaggerated the significance of their hair analyses or reported them inaccurately. Defendants will be notified and free DNA testing offered if errors in lab work or testimony are detected.

“The government’s willingness to admit error and accept its duty to correct those errors in an extraordinarily large number of cases is truly unprecedented,” declared Peter Neufeld, a co-director of the Innocence Project. “It signals a new era in this country that values science and recognizes that truth and justice should triumph over procedural obstacles.”

DNA testing can cost several thousand dollars, Innocence Project spokesman Paul Cates said in an interview Thursday.

“There is no reason to believe the FBI Laboratory employed ‘flawed’ forensic techniques,” FBI Special Agent Ann Todd, a spokeswoman for the bureau, said in an email. “The purpose of the review is to determine if FBI Laboratory examiner testimony and reports properly reflect the bounds of the underlying science.”

Todd called microscopic hair analysis “a valid forensic technique and one that is still conducted at the lab” in conjunction with DNA testing. But in some cases, defense attorneys say, lab analysts have overstated the significance of their findings.

In 1981, for instance, an 18-year-old Washington resident named Kirk Odom was convicted of rape and sodomy. At his trial, an FBI analyst testified that Odom’s hair samples and samples taken from the crime scene “were indistinguishable” and that this was very rare. Odom was convicted and served about 22 years in prison. In 2011, he was exonerated by DNA testing that wasn’t available at the time of his original trial.

Odom’s case, along with the cases of two other Washington men who’d also been exonerated by DNA testing after convictions based, in part, on testimony about hair analysis, prompted the broader FBI review.

“The number of cases that involve potential testimony errors is not known, at this time,” Todd said.

Of 310 individuals exonerated through DNA evidence, according to an Innocence Project database, 72 were convicted in part because of microscopic hair evidence.

Some died before they could be exonerated.

In 1986, a jury convicted Army veteran Timothy Brian Cole of raping a Texas Tech University student. A lab analyst testified that there were similarities between Cole’s pubic hair and hair found on the victim. Cole died in prison in 1999, about a decade before DNA testing and the real rapist’s confession exonerated him.

In other cases, wrongly convicted defendants survived their incarceration.

Dwayne Allen Dail was convicted in 1989 of a rape in Goldsboro, N.C., after testimony from the victim, as well as from a North Carolina State Bureau of Investigation forensic chemist. The lab analyst said hairs at the crime scene could have come from Dail, and his views, though not definitive, were heard by the jurors as those of a recognized expert.

Dail was exonerated in 2007 after DNA testing.

Cates, the Innocence Project spokesman, said that “we are hopeful that state crime labs will also recognize their duty” to confirm the accuracy of past lab tests, although the agreement announced Thursday covers only testimony and reports from FBI lab analysts.

Source: McClatchyDC

- Advertisement -

More articles

- Advertisement -

Latest article

Trees and shrubs might reveal the location of decomposing bodies

Plants could help investigators find dead bodies. Botanists believe the sudden flush of nutrients into the soil from decomposition may affect nearby foliage. If...

Are Detectives discounting the associative value of fingerprints that fall short of an identification in their investigations?

Every day, Fingerprint Experts in every latent office across the globe examine fingermarks that they determine to fall short of an identification....

Using the NCIC Bayesian Network to improve your AFIS searches

This National Crime Information Centre (NCIC) Bayesian network is based on the statistical data of general patterns of fingerprints on the hands...

DNA decontamination of fingerprint brushes

Using fingerprint brushes across multiple crime scenes yields a high risk of DNA cross-contamination. Thankfully an Australian study has discovered a quick and easy way to safely decontaminate fingerprint brushes to prevent this contamination risk and allows the brushes to be safely reused even after multiple cleaning cycles.

Detection of latent fingerprint hidden beneath adhesive tape by optical coherence tomography

Adhesive tape is a common item which can be encountered in criminal cases involving rape, murder, kidnapping and explosives. It is often the case...