Sunday, December 6, 2020

Your face or fingerprint could soon replace your plane ticket

Must read

Historic Scottish Trial: First Conviction Under New ‘Double Jeopardy’ Law

Angus Sinclair's retrial for the brutal murders of Christine Eadie and Helen Scott was the first to take place following changes made in Scotland...

Presenting Fingerprint Comparisons in Court using Forensic Comparison Software

This video gives the fingerprint technician some ideas on how to present a Fingerprint Comparison result to the court that looks professional. To accomplish this...

Scientists identify gases unique to rotting pigs and human bones

After we die, our rotting bodies release specific types of gases into the environment. When a body goes missing, dogs can sniff for these...

Sex offending is written in DNA of some men, Oxford University finds

Sex offending is written in the genes, an unprecedented study has shown, with the brothers of men convicted of sex crimes five times more...
Michael Whyte
Crime Scene Officer and Fingerprint Expert with over 12 years experience in Crime Scene Investigation and Latent Print Analysis. The opinions or assertions contained on this site are the private views of the author and are not to be construed as those of any professional organisation or policing body.
- Forensic Podcast -

Headed on a trip? You may soon be able to ditch your boarding pass in favor of your fingers or face.

Delta announced, on 31st May 2017, a new biometric identification pilot program that will eventually let you use your fingerprints instead of a plane ticket. That followed a JetBlue announcement hours earlier that it is testing a program in Boston that will match pictures of customers’ faces with the passport database maintained by U.S. Custom and Border Protections.

Delta’s program, which kicked off at Washington’s Reagan National Airport, is in partnership with Clear, a company that already lets customers skip to the front of security lines without identification. To be eligible for the program, one must be a member of Delta’s frequent-flier SkyMiles program and a Clear subscriber.

The first phase of Delta’s program will allow its elite-tier passengers to use their fingerprints, rather than their boarding passes, to enter member lounges. A planned second phase would allow Delta frequent fliers to use their fingerprint in lieu of a boarding pass. Per its privacy policy, which will cover the Delta program, Clear keeps users’ biometric information for the term of their subscriptions. Users can ask for their information to be removed from the company’s servers and close their accounts at any time.

The airline has also announced it will use facial recognition technology for bag drops, with a pilot testing program at Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport in the summer.

JetBlue’s program works in concert with two entities: the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and a tech firm called SITA. Fliers at Boston’s Logan International Airport and Aruba’s Queen Beatrix International Airport will have the option of going into the normal boarding line, or one with a camera that will snap their picture. SITA will send that photo to the CBP, to match it against the agency’s database of passport and visa photos. The match process is instant, JetBlue said.

Neither JetBlue nor SITA has access to the photo database, and the airline will not store users’ biometric information, JetBlue confirmed in an email.

If the facial scan fails to work, passengers will be moved to the traditional line — so don’t travel without your ID just yet.

Using biometric data for identification may sound convenient, but people should consider some things before signing up, said Jeramie Scott, national security counsel for the Electronic Privacy Information Center.

Neither company has released details on how the government may use information on when and where people’s faces have been scanned, he said, nor are there laws to prevent the government from using these types of programs as part of larger surveillance plans.

“It’s a technology that can easily be used for mass, indiscriminate surveillance,” he said, of facial recognition technology. “Any use for facial recognition for something like this — where it’s the government or companies running a facial recognition search on people — needs to be scrutinized very closely by the public, because of the serious risk of mission creep.”

- Advertisement -

More articles

- Advertisement -

Latest article

Trees and shrubs might reveal the location of decomposing bodies

Plants could help investigators find dead bodies. Botanists believe the sudden flush of nutrients into the soil from decomposition may affect nearby foliage. If...

Are Detectives discounting the associative value of fingerprints that fall short of an identification in their investigations?

Every day, Fingerprint Experts in every latent office across the globe examine fingermarks that they determine to fall short of an identification....

Using the NCIC Bayesian Network to improve your AFIS searches

This National Crime Information Centre (NCIC) Bayesian network is based on the statistical data of general patterns of fingerprints on the hands...

DNA decontamination of fingerprint brushes

Using fingerprint brushes across multiple crime scenes yields a high risk of DNA cross-contamination. Thankfully an Australian study has discovered a quick and easy way to safely decontaminate fingerprint brushes to prevent this contamination risk and allows the brushes to be safely reused even after multiple cleaning cycles.

Detection of latent fingerprint hidden beneath adhesive tape by optical coherence tomography

Adhesive tape is a common item which can be encountered in criminal cases involving rape, murder, kidnapping and explosives. It is often the case...