Thursday, August 13, 2020

DNA is Hardier Than We Thought, It can survive a Rocket Launch!

Must read

Forensic Fails: The Shirley McKie Fingerprint Scandal

In light of the recent FBI hair analysis outrage, it seemed appropriate to revisit an old classic in the history of failing forensic science. The...

IAI 100th International Educational Conference

The International Association for Identification (IAI) will be holding its 100 year centenary between August 2-8, 2015, in Sacramento, California.  The IAI strives to be the...

Through Art and Forensics, Faces of Unidentified Victims Emerge

Anyone who walked into Room 501 at the New York Academy of Art in TriBeCa the other day would have seen a roomful of...

Revolutionary fingerprint powder can reveal criminal’s sex and drug habits

A revolutionary powder claims to be able to discover what a person has eaten, what medication they’re on and even their sex, all from...
Michael Whyte
Crime Scene Officer and Fingerprint Expert with over 7 years experience in Crime Scene Investigation and Latent Print Analysis. The opinions or assertions contained on this site are the private views of the author and are not to be construed as those of any professional organisation or policing body.
- Forensic Podcast -

Astrobiology was in the news recently after a group of researchers led by Cora Thiel from the University of Zurich in Switzerland reported in the journal PLOS One that DNA can survive a short suborbital spaceflight.

DNA had been applied to the exterior of the TEXUS-49 rocket launched in 2011, in protected areas such as the grooves of screw heads. After the rocket landed, the researchers analyzed these areas for surviving biomarkers. To their astonishment they found not only the biomarkers, but the DNA itself—up to 53 percent of the originally applied DNA was still there. Furthermore, up to 35 percent of the DNA was fully functional after a brief exposure to space (the entire mission lasted 20 minutes).

The initial reaction from some scientists was that the finding makes the idea of panspermia—the transfer of life from one planet to the other in space—much more likely, and may have direct implications for the origin of life on Earth.

While the report is intriguing, and suggests that DNA is much more resistant than many of us previously thought, the connection to panspermia theory has to be taken with a grain of salt. First, the DNA applied to the rocket was plasmid DNA, which is a short piece of DNA, like a flash drive for a computer, that provides only a limited amount of information related to adaptation to extreme environments or antibiotic resistance. Chromosomal DNA, which is much longer and has the function of reproduction, is less hardy.

Further, the DNA on TEXUS was not exposed to the full rigors of space, since it reached an altitude of just 268 kilometers, and for only a short period. DNA is most susceptible to damage from radiation, particularly cosmic radiation and ultraviolet radiation, and any DNA traveling from one planet to another would be exposed to the full rigors of space for a very long time, at least thousands of years. If it hitchhiked on a meteorite, it would have to withstand much higher temperatures entering Earth’s atmosphere than it did during a controlled rocket flight. Also, DNA by itself is not life; entire cells would have to survive in order to be able to metabolize and reproduce.

The researchers should be congratulated for trying an “outside-the-box” experiment, which produced a result not many of us would have expected. But I don’t believe it has direct implications for how and where life originated. That probably happened in a little pond or a hydrothermal vent on the surface or just below the surface of our planet, in a place well protected from the harshness of space.

Source: Air & Space Magazine

- Advertisement -

More articles

- Advertisement -

Latest article

Using the NCIC Bayesian Network to improve your AFIS searches

This National Crime Information Centre (NCIC) Bayesian network is based on the statistical data of general patterns of fingerprints on the hands...

DNA decontamination of fingerprint brushes

Using fingerprint brushes across multiple crime scenes yields a high risk of DNA cross-contamination. Thankfully an Australian study has discovered a quick and easy way to safely decontaminate fingerprint brushes to prevent this contamination risk and allows the brushes to be safely reused even after multiple cleaning cycles.

Detection of latent fingerprint hidden beneath adhesive tape by optical coherence tomography

Adhesive tape is a common item which can be encountered in criminal cases involving rape, murder, kidnapping and explosives. It is often the case...

Presenting Fingerprint Comparisons in Court using Forensic Comparison Software

This video gives the fingerprint technician some ideas on how to present a Fingerprint Comparison result to the court that looks professional. To accomplish this...

New modified fingerprint chemical that fluoresces touch DNA on clothing

In sexual assault and burglary investigations, the recovery of DNA from items that have been handled by the suspect is very important....