Tuesday, March 31, 2020

Court: Fingerprints alone don’t prove possession of a firearm

Must read

Chemotherapy causes patients to loose their fingerprints

A 65-year-old breast cancer patient in Mexico has lost her fingerprints, perhaps permanently. The woman was diagnosed with “hand-foot syndrome” caused by her chemotherapy...

Shoe dunnit: Burglars being nabbed by new forensic evidence found in their footprints

More than 70 burglars have been caught by detectives using cutting-edge technology that allows officers to match suspects’ shoeprints quickly to the scenes of...

DNA Links Boston Strangling to Confessed Suspect

BOSTON — Investigators have linked the man believed by many to have been the Boston Strangler to DNA found in the home of a...

Fingerprint identifications from images and video recovered from cell phones

This week we saw an excellent case of a fingerprint identification from Sarasota, Florida, where fingerprint detail was obtained from a photograph recovered from a Samsung mobile...
Michael Whyte
Crime Scene Officer and Fingerprint Expert with over 7 years experience in Crime Scene Investigation and Latent Print Analysis. The opinions or assertions contained on this site are the private views of the author and are not to be construed as those of any professional organisation or policing body.
- Forensic Podcast -

Fingerprints found on a weapon should not have automatically led to the conviction of a felon for illegally being in possession of a firearm, a federal appeals court has ruled.

The U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has overturned the 9-year, 7-month sentence of Brett Combs, found guilty in Las Vegas of illegally possessing a semiautomatic rifle in 2012. At the time, he was on parole for a burglary and gun conviction in Colorado, according to court records.

The appeals court sent the case back District Court to determine if other evidence showed Combs, 34, was in actual possession of a firearm.

- Advertisement -

More articles

- Advertisement -

Latest article

Using the NCIC Bayesian Network to improve your AFIS searches

This National Crime Information Centre (NCIC) Bayesian network is based on the statistical data of general patterns of fingerprints on the hands...

DNA decontamination of fingerprint brushes

Using fingerprint brushes across multiple crime scenes yields a high risk of DNA cross-contamination. Thankfully an Australian study has discovered a quick and easy way to safely decontaminate fingerprint brushes to prevent this contamination risk and allows the brushes to be safely reused even after multiple cleaning cycles.

Detection of latent fingerprint hidden beneath adhesive tape by optical coherence tomography

Adhesive tape is a common item which can be encountered in criminal cases involving rape, murder, kidnapping and explosives. It is often the case...

Presenting Fingerprint Comparisons in Court using Forensic Comparison Software

This video gives the fingerprint technician some ideas on how to present a Fingerprint Comparison result to the court that looks professional. To accomplish this...

New modified fingerprint chemical that fluoresces touch DNA on clothing

In sexual assault and burglary investigations, the recovery of DNA from items that have been handled by the suspect is very important....