Thursday, August 13, 2020

Court: Fingerprints alone don’t prove possession of a firearm

Must read

Fingerprints Lifted from Fabric

Scottish police have paired up with forensics experts from the University of Abertay Dundee to make lifting fingerprints from fabric possible for the first time....

Third Michael Brown autopsy unlikely to solve mystery

A third autopsy was conducted on Monday on the body of Michael Brown, the black teenager shot by a police officer on 9 August...

The acid test: Can you dissolve a body completely?

Think you can dissolve a body in an acid bath, Breaking Bad style, and get away with it? Think again says Erwin Vermeij Working at the...

Technology sheds new light on fingerprints and other evidence

Forensic science manager Greg Mason calls it the Ferrari of crime scene processing. He's talking about the new full spectrum imaging systems designed to detect...
Michael Whyte
Crime Scene Officer and Fingerprint Expert with over 7 years experience in Crime Scene Investigation and Latent Print Analysis. The opinions or assertions contained on this site are the private views of the author and are not to be construed as those of any professional organisation or policing body.
- Forensic Podcast -

Fingerprints found on a weapon should not have automatically led to the conviction of a felon for illegally being in possession of a firearm, a federal appeals court has ruled.

The U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has overturned the 9-year, 7-month sentence of Brett Combs, found guilty in Las Vegas of illegally possessing a semiautomatic rifle in 2012. At the time, he was on parole for a burglary and gun conviction in Colorado, according to court records.

The appeals court sent the case back District Court to determine if other evidence showed Combs, 34, was in actual possession of a firearm.

- Advertisement -

More articles

- Advertisement -

Latest article

Using the NCIC Bayesian Network to improve your AFIS searches

This National Crime Information Centre (NCIC) Bayesian network is based on the statistical data of general patterns of fingerprints on the hands...

DNA decontamination of fingerprint brushes

Using fingerprint brushes across multiple crime scenes yields a high risk of DNA cross-contamination. Thankfully an Australian study has discovered a quick and easy way to safely decontaminate fingerprint brushes to prevent this contamination risk and allows the brushes to be safely reused even after multiple cleaning cycles.

Detection of latent fingerprint hidden beneath adhesive tape by optical coherence tomography

Adhesive tape is a common item which can be encountered in criminal cases involving rape, murder, kidnapping and explosives. It is often the case...

Presenting Fingerprint Comparisons in Court using Forensic Comparison Software

This video gives the fingerprint technician some ideas on how to present a Fingerprint Comparison result to the court that looks professional. To accomplish this...

New modified fingerprint chemical that fluoresces touch DNA on clothing

In sexual assault and burglary investigations, the recovery of DNA from items that have been handled by the suspect is very important....