Sunday, November 1, 2020

Can DNA Demand A Verdict?

Must read

British forensic experts work with Mexican parents to create database of disappeared

As Mexican president announces police revamp following student atrocity outrage, British-funded project aims to identify human remains buried in mass graves across violence-plagued country. British...

DNA is Hardier Than We Thought, It can survive a Rocket Launch!

Astrobiology was in the news recently after a group of researchers led by Cora Thiel from the University of Zurich in Switzerland reported in...

New forensics technique calculates exact time of death

Determining the time of death isn't an exact science, and it becomes less and less exact as time passes. But a new method, developed...

One of Missing 43 Students In Mexico Is Identified Among Incinerated Remains

Forensics experts have identified one of the missing Mexican students among incinerated remains found in a remote dump in Cocula, Guerrero, relatives said, at least partially...
Michael Whyte
Crime Scene Officer and Fingerprint Expert with over 7 years experience in Crime Scene Investigation and Latent Print Analysis. The opinions or assertions contained on this site are the private views of the author and are not to be construed as those of any professional organisation or policing body.
- Forensic Podcast -

In 1987, forensic DNA analysis made its first appearance in a US courtroom. Originally known as “DNA fingerprinting,” this type of analysis is now called “DNA profiling” or “DNA testing” to distinguish it from traditional skin fingerprinting. Even though it is used in less than 1% of all criminal cases, DNA profiling has helped to acquit or convict suspects in many of the most violent crimes, including rape and murder.

How can DNA be used to identify an individual?

Almost every cell in our bodies contains DNA, the genetic material that programs how cells work. Any two people share, on average, 99.9% of their DNA, meaning that only 0.1% of your DNA is unique to you! The only exception is identical twins, who share 100% of their DNA. Each human cell contains three billion DNA base pairs. Our unique DNA, 0.1% of 3 billion, amounts to 3 million base pairs. That’s more than enough to provide a profile that accurately identifies a person.

DNA is often left behind at a crime scene. It is present in all kinds of evidence, including blood, hair, skin, saliva, and semen. Scientists can analyze the DNA in evidence samples to see if it matches a suspect’s DNA.

Forensic DNA Analysis

Below, you can see how DNA evidence used to be collected and analyzed. In its early days, DNA analysis required an evidence sample at least the size of a dime. Today’s techniques can amplify the DNA using PCR, making millions of copies from tiny amounts of evidence, such as the saliva from a cigarette butt. This approach is also helpful for analyzing poor-quality DNA in evidence samples collected from dirty crime scenes or in very old samples.

Blood relatives have more similar DNA

Unrelated individuals have three million DNA bases that differ between them, but blood relatives have fewer differences. If the DNA profile from a piece of evidence is similar—but not identical—to that of a suspect, officials may investigate blood relatives of the suspect.

What about human error?

Forensic investigators take many precautions to prevent mistakes, but human error can never be eliminated. The National Research Council (NRC) recommends that evidence samples be divided soon after they’re collected, so that if a mix-up were to occur, there would be backup samples to analyze.

To detect possible contamination of DNA samples during collection or handling, evidence DNA profiles are typically compared with those from detectives at the crime scene, the victim, a randomly chosen person, or a DNA profile from a database. Each sample is assigned a code, and testers don’t know who the samples came from.

The NRC recommends that forensic DNA analysis be conducted by an unbiased outside laboratory that maintains a high level of quality control and a low error rate.

Is DNA evidence alone enough to acquit or convict?

It is easier to exclude a suspect than to convict someone based on a DNA match. The FBI estimates that one-third of initial rape suspects are excluded because DNA samples fail to match.

Forensic DNA is just one of many types of evidence. Investigators also look at other clues, such as motive, weapons, alibis, and additional evidence linking a suspect to the crime scene. When multiple lines of evidence tell a consistent story, investigators can be assured that samples from a particular suspect were not planted, either on purpose or by accident, at the crime scene.

Can DNA evidence exonerate wrongfully convicted prisoners?

The Innocence Project at New York’s Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law aims to exonerate prisoners wrongfully convicted of crimes. The project uses DNA profiling evidence to support the re-evaluation of criminal cases. But DNA evidence alone is not enough to get a person out of jail: the case must be re-examined by a judge, along with lawyers representing both sides of the case. Since 1992, the Innocence Project and others have used DNA evidence to exonerated over 300 prisoners, including eighteen who were on death row—one of whom was only five days from execution.

While some states will reconsider cases with compelling DNA evidence regardless of when the trial ended, several states restrict the time for post-trial submission of DNA evidence to six months or less. And unfortunately, the evidence from some cases has been lost or destroyed, making DNA analysis impossible. The Innocence Project seeks to reform the criminal justice system in ways that will improve access to DNA testing, improve evidence preservation, and permit re-evaluation of DNA evidence in closed cases.

Is DNA-profiling technology used appropriately for justice?

DNA profiling can be a powerful tool in criminal investigations. Its success in the courtroom depends upon many factors, including:

  • Proper handling of evidence
  • Careful analysis by an unbiased forensic laboratory
  • Fair and appropriate interpretation of the results
  • Accurate and effective reporting of results to judges and jurors

When used correctly, DNA profiling is a powerful forensic tool. It can be used to quickly eliminate a suspect, saving time in searches for perpetrators. And it can provide compelling evidence to support a conviction and, most importantly, reduce the chances of a wrongful conviction.

Source: University of Utah

- Advertisement -

More articles

- Advertisement -

Latest article

Trees and shrubs might reveal the location of decomposing bodies

Plants could help investigators find dead bodies. Botanists believe the sudden flush of nutrients into the soil from decomposition may affect nearby foliage. If...

Are Detectives discounting the associative value of fingerprints that fall short of an identification in their investigations?

Every day, Fingerprint Experts in every latent office across the globe examine fingermarks that they determine to fall short of an identification....

Using the NCIC Bayesian Network to improve your AFIS searches

This National Crime Information Centre (NCIC) Bayesian network is based on the statistical data of general patterns of fingerprints on the hands...

DNA decontamination of fingerprint brushes

Using fingerprint brushes across multiple crime scenes yields a high risk of DNA cross-contamination. Thankfully an Australian study has discovered a quick and easy way to safely decontaminate fingerprint brushes to prevent this contamination risk and allows the brushes to be safely reused even after multiple cleaning cycles.

Detection of latent fingerprint hidden beneath adhesive tape by optical coherence tomography

Adhesive tape is a common item which can be encountered in criminal cases involving rape, murder, kidnapping and explosives. It is often the case...