Tuesday, November 24, 2020

430,000-year-old skull suggests murder is an ‘ancient human behavior’

Must read

3D Printing Takes the Place of Traditional Clay Modeling in Forensic Facial Reconstruction

3D printing is now proving extremely useful in the field of forensic facial reconstruction, a method of identifying skeletal remains. The process consists of...

Forensic DNA tests show majority of Thai ivory on sale comes from African elephants

Ivory traffickers be warned: the Thai authorities have a powerful forensic tool in the country’s drive to detect ivory of illegal origin entering its...

Canadian judge admonished for doing too much fingerprint homework

A judge in British Columbia has been admonished for stepping “into the fray” by conducting independent research about the reliability of fingerprint evidence found...

Fingerprints: Analysis and Understanding

The unique composition of the skin on the inner hands and bottom of the feet affords not only a utilitarian benefit in providing friction...
Michael Whyte
Crime Scene Officer and Fingerprint Expert with over 12 years experience in Crime Scene Investigation and Latent Print Analysis. The opinions or assertions contained on this site are the private views of the author and are not to be construed as those of any professional organisation or policing body.
- Forensic Podcast -

It’s a whodunit that dates back 430,000 years.

Deep in a cave in northern Spain, archaeologists have uncovered fragments of a skull with protruding eyebrow ridges and a smaller brain area than you would find in a modern-day human. Researchers say it belongs to an early human relative that predates even the Neanderthals.

It took scientists years to reconstruct the ancient cranium from 52 bits of bone, each about the size of a quarter. But when they finally did, they noticed something strange: The skull had two holes just left of the center of the forehead.

The two wounds were almost identical, and could not have been caused by a fall, an attack by a predator or an accidental collision with a tree or rock, the archaeologists said. And so they came to a dark conclusion: This ancient skull is evidence of the earliest known murder among our ancestors.

The findings, published this week in the journal PLOS One, suggest that interpersonal violence may be baked into the human experience.

“One implication of the study is that murder is a very ancient human behavior,” said Rolf Quam, a paleoanthropologist at Binghamton University in New York who worked on the study.

The pieces of bone that make up what the team calls “Cranium 17”  were unearthed over the course of several years at an underground cave known as Sima de los Huesos, or the “Pit of Bones.”

Using forensic techniques similar to those on “CSI,” they determined that the victim was alive when the attack occurred because the fractures on the forehead were characterised by oblique angles and smooth surfaces. Fractures that occur after death have right angles and jagged surfaces because the bone has started to dry out.

Based on the impact trajectories, the researchers believe the victim was facing his assailant when the violence occurred.

“We don’t know whether it is face-to-face combat or an ambush,” said Quam. “What we can definitely say is it is intentional.”

The authors are not sure what type of weapon was used, but a wooden spear or stone hand-ax are likely candidates, the researchers said. Metal tools had not yet been invented.

“We are pretty sure that these two fractures are the result of two repeated blows with the same implement,” Quam said. “And that implies a clear intent to kill.”

There is evidence of cannibalism among early humans dating back 900,000 years, but evidence of murder has been harder to find.

Researchers have previously found a 25,000-year-old Homo sapien fossil from the Russian plains with a puncture wound on one of the vertebrae. That wound surely would have been fatal, but it might have been the result of a hunting accident rather than willful violence.

There’s also a Neanderthal that lived 75,000 to 100,000 years ago in present-day Iraq. This individual had a life-threatening puncture wound to one of the ribs, but it looks like it had started to heal. That suggests the Neanderthal did not die immediately from this injury.

Cranium 17 was discovered at the bottom of a vertical shaft that lies about 0.3 of a mile from the entrance to the underground cave system. The only way to enter the cavern was by falling 45 feet through a hole in the floor.

The archaeologists say it is unlikely that any of the 28 early humans who wound up at the bottom of the shaft got there by accident. And since the victim could not have sustained the lethal injuries in the cavern, he must have been thrown into the pit after death — perhaps as an early form of burial.

Clues about how our earliest ancestors lived are rare, which is why experts say this discovery is so provocative.

“Anthropologists are always asking what makes us human, and are humans inherently violent?” said Danielle Kurin, a forensic anthropologist at UC Santa Barbara who was not involved in the research. “This study contributes to that debate by suggesting intentional assault between two people has deep roots in our hominid human history.”

Source: LA Times

- Advertisement -

More articles

- Advertisement -

Latest article

Trees and shrubs might reveal the location of decomposing bodies

Plants could help investigators find dead bodies. Botanists believe the sudden flush of nutrients into the soil from decomposition may affect nearby foliage. If...

Are Detectives discounting the associative value of fingerprints that fall short of an identification in their investigations?

Every day, Fingerprint Experts in every latent office across the globe examine fingermarks that they determine to fall short of an identification....

Using the NCIC Bayesian Network to improve your AFIS searches

This National Crime Information Centre (NCIC) Bayesian network is based on the statistical data of general patterns of fingerprints on the hands...

DNA decontamination of fingerprint brushes

Using fingerprint brushes across multiple crime scenes yields a high risk of DNA cross-contamination. Thankfully an Australian study has discovered a quick and easy way to safely decontaminate fingerprint brushes to prevent this contamination risk and allows the brushes to be safely reused even after multiple cleaning cycles.

Detection of latent fingerprint hidden beneath adhesive tape by optical coherence tomography

Adhesive tape is a common item which can be encountered in criminal cases involving rape, murder, kidnapping and explosives. It is often the case...